Feature image: Back on the Map – credit Dave Charnley
We have now submitted our Network’s response to the Regulator for Social Housing’s 2026 More and Better Social Homes proposals. In this, our network calls proportionate, workable regulations for CLTs developing homes.
In June 2026 the Regulator for Social Housing published a set of early proposals to reform social housing regulation ahead of a formal 2027 consultation. See these here.
This is a key window to advocate for proportionate regulation for CLT social landlords, protect community-led models from unfair “high-risk” branding and make sure that regulations are suitable for how CLTs operate and develop. This was also an opportunity to highlight how CLTs deliver genuine community accountability.
At present, 13 CLTs or CLT Network member organisations are Registered Providers of Social Housing, with a further 2 actively applying and and 4 exploring becoming an RP (that we know of). Of those, one owns 635 homes, while the rest own an average of 35. This small size reflects both the start-up nature of many CLTs and their hyperlocal focus. A further 144 CLT projects are partnerships with RPs, providing 642 social/affordable rent homes and with a further 1,019 in various stages of development.
Although CLTs are a small route to development, they bring innovation and essential diversification to the supply of affordable housing. This is especially relevant where many CLTs are able to develop homes where larger or more commercial housing providers often cannot. This means that policy and regulation should support and not stymy CLT development.
Here is our final submission to the More and Better Social Homes early call for evidence:
This response was co-created through a workshop where our members, including CLTs, community-led enablers, and CLT allies, shared their questions, experiences and concerns. We are very grateful to everyone who contributed their time and expertise towards this collective response, with a special thanks to Paul Brannigan (Calder Valley CLT) for raising this opportunity in our CLT Network member forum.
We will continue to keep an eye on updates relating to this consultation as well as further opportunities to work as a network to lobby for approaches to housing and placemaking that support community land trusts.
